A Hospital-Based Study Evaluating Clinical Profile, Treatment Modalities, and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure

In this paper, a critical reflection of Mahatma Gandhi Constructive Programme as the theoretical foundation of preventive peace will be presented as well as the relevance of the method to modern counter-terrorism measures. It assumes that the current security-oriented strategies, based on militarisation, surveillance and coercive actions, respond only to the symptomatic expression of terrorism, and fail to respond to the structural causes of terrorism to include socioeconomic inequality, alienation and moral decadence. Using the seminal works of Gandhi in the book Hind Swaraj and other books such as Young India and Collected Works, the paper examines how the ethics-based principles of Satyagraha (Truth-Force) and Sarvodaya (Welfare of All) is a non-violent approach to counter-radicalisation. The paper takes a qualitative textual approach to recast the ideals of Gandhism in its wider context of human security and preventive diplomacy with references to the framework of the United Nations and current scholarship of peace-building. It counters that the community resilience can be strengthened by advocating decentralised rule, moral education, community coexistence and trusteeship as advocated by Gandhi to reduce the lure of extremist ideologies. Empirical support is there by giving examples of what Gandhi did in the Noakhali riots and latest developments like the Operation Sadbhavana of India and community-based programmes of United Nations confirm the fact that his methods are still applicable. Finally, the research concludes that the inclusion of the principles of Gandhian preventive peace into the counter-terrorist policy can reconcile the moral philosophy and practical government and thus attaching a higher value to the proactive prevention of terrorism in response. This synthesis provides a viable pattern that is in line with international efforts to deal with violent extremism by integrating development, ethical governance and social justice.